# Claim 922

The Court held that the statute was not an arbitrary or unreasonable exercise of the state's police power and sustained its constitutionality.

Published 2026-09-26. Last reviewed 2026-09-26. 1 source.

- Statement: The Court held that the statute was not an arbitrary or unreasonable exercise of the state's police power and sustained its constitutionality.
- Field: status
- Value: Statute not an unreasonable exercise of police power
- About: [incident 1925-us-supreme-court-upholds-gitlow-anarchy-conviction](https://thewaronnews.com/incidents/1925-us-supreme-court-upholds-gitlow-anarchy-conviction)
- Source: Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925). https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/268/652
- Publisher: Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925)
- Method: court record
- Checked: 2026-09-26
- Confidence: high
- Status: current
- Source date: 1925-06-08

## Quotation from the source

> We cannot hold that the present statute is an arbitrary or unreasonable exercise of the police power of the State unwarrantably infringing the freedom of speech or press; and we must and do sustain its constitutionality.

Source page: https://thewaronnews.com/claims/922. The War On News, CC BY 4.0.