{
  "id": 154,
  "url": "https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/united-states-ex-rel-milwaukee-social-democratic-publishing-co-v-burleson/",
  "final_url": "https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/united-states-ex-rel-milwaukee-social-democratic-publishing-co-v-burleson/",
  "title": "United States ex rel. Milwaukee Social Democratic Publishing Co. v. Burleson",
  "publisher": "The First Amendment Encyclopedia, Middle Tennessee State University",
  "published_on": null,
  "link_state": "live",
  "link_state_since": "2026-09-22T23:23:23Z",
  "wayback_url": null,
  "wayback_saved_at": null,
  "source_kind": "court_record",
  "last_checked": "2026-09-23T01:50:04Z",
  "archive_attempts": 0,
  "checks": [
    {
      "checked_at": "2026-09-23T01:50:04Z",
      "checker": "twon-linkcheck/1.0",
      "http_status": 200,
      "final_url": "https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/united-states-ex-rel-milwaukee-social-democratic-publishing-co-v-burleson/",
      "observed_state": "live",
      "detail": null
    },
    {
      "checked_at": "2026-09-23T01:42:03Z",
      "checker": "twon-linkcheck/1.0",
      "http_status": 200,
      "final_url": "https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/united-states-ex-rel-milwaukee-social-democratic-publishing-co-v-burleson/",
      "observed_state": "live",
      "detail": null
    },
    {
      "checked_at": "2026-09-22T23:48:20Z",
      "checker": "twon-linkcheck/1.0",
      "http_status": 200,
      "final_url": "https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/united-states-ex-rel-milwaukee-social-democratic-publishing-co-v-burleson/",
      "observed_state": "live",
      "detail": null
    },
    {
      "checked_at": "2026-09-22T23:23:23Z",
      "checker": "twon-linkcheck/1.0",
      "http_status": 200,
      "final_url": "https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/united-states-ex-rel-milwaukee-social-democratic-publishing-co-v-burleson/",
      "observed_state": "live",
      "detail": null
    }
  ],
  "claims": [
    {
      "id": 117,
      "statement": "The Supreme Court's majority held that the Constitution was adopted to preserve the government, not to protect those who used its privileges to try to destroy it, in upholding Burleson's revocation of the paper's mailing rate.",
      "status": "current"
    },
    {
      "id": 118,
      "statement": "Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes dissented, warning the ruling treated access to the mail, nearly as essential to free speech as the ability to speak, as something a postmaster could take away.",
      "status": "current"
    },
    {
      "id": 119,
      "statement": "Justice Louis Brandeis dissented that the majority's approach would let the Post Office run what amounted to a system of censorship.",
      "status": "current"
    }
  ],
  "incidents": [
    {
      "slug": "1917-us-burleson-mail-ban-milwaukee-leader",
      "title": "United States Postmaster General Burleson strips the Milwaukee Leader of its mailing rate"
    }
  ]
}