Claim 137
The Court said the First Amendment does not void every incidental burden on the press that results from enforcing general criminal or civil law.
- Statement
- The Court said the First Amendment does not void every incidental burden on the press that results from enforcing general criminal or civil law.
- Field
- effect_on_reporting
- Value
- Incidental burdens permitted
- About
- incident 1972-us-branzburg-v-hayes-reporters-privilege
- Source
- Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972)
- Publisher
- Justia US Supreme Court Center
- Method
- court record
- Checked
- 2026-09-22
- Confidence
- medium
- Status
- current
- Source date
- 1972-06-29
Quotation from the source
It is clear that the First Amendment does not invalidate every incidental burdening of the press that may result from the enforcement of civil or criminal statutes of general applicability.