Claim 422

Kamra's counsel argued there was no constitutional right to true information that could justify the rule.

Published 2026-09-22. Last reviewed 2026-09-22. 1 source.

Statement: Kamra's counsel argued there was no constitutional right to true information that could justify the rule.
Field: effect_on_reporting
Value: Petitioner argues no right to the truth exists
About: incident 2024-india-court-strikes-down-fact-check-unit
Source: IT (Amendment) Rules, 2023 struck down by the Bombay High Court
Publisher: Internet Freedom Foundation
Method: outlet report
Checked: 2026-09-22
Confidence: medium
Status: current
Source date: 2024-09-20

Quotation from the source

no fundamental right to true and correct information under Article 19(1)(a)