The War On News

A record of government actions against journalism and fact-based reporting, from the first press laws to today

Claim

Claim 800

Judge Stuart found that the nature of the crimes charged created a clear and present danger that pretrial publicity could impinge on the defendant's right to a fair trial.

Published 2026-09-26. Last reviewed 2026-09-26. 1 source.

Statement
Judge Stuart found that the nature of the crimes charged created a clear and present danger that pretrial publicity could impinge on the defendant's right to a fair trial.
Field
stated_justification
Value
Clear and present danger finding
About
incident 1975-us-nebraska-press-v-stuart-restrictive-order
Source
Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539 (1976)
Publisher
Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
Method
court record
Checked
2026-09-26
Confidence
high
Status
current
Source date
1976-06-30

Quotation from the source

because of the nature of the crimes charged in the complaint that there is a clear and present danger that pre-trial publicity could impinge upon the defendant's right to a fair trial.