Claim

Claim 834

Justice Potter Stewart dissented, warning that the suggestion there are limits on the public's right to know what goes on in the courts caused him deep concern.

Published 2026-09-26. Last reviewed 2026-09-26. 1 source.

Statement: Justice Potter Stewart dissented, warning that the suggestion there are limits on the public's right to know what goes on in the courts caused him deep concern.
Field: effect_on_reporting
Value: Stewart dissent on public access
About: incident 1962-us-estes-v-texas-camera-ban
Source: Estes v. Texas, 381 U.S. 532 (1965)
Publisher: Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute
Method: court record
Checked: 2026-09-26
Confidence: high
Status: current
Source date: 1965-06-07

Quotation from the source

The suggestion that there are limits upon the public's right to know what goes on in the courts causes me deep concern.