The War On News

A record of government actions against journalism and fact-based reporting, from the first press laws to today

Claim

Claim 895

Sutherland found the tax's form itself suspicious because it was measured by the extent of a newspaper's circulation rather than by the volume of its advertising.

Published 2026-09-26. Last reviewed 2026-09-26. 1 source.

Statement
Sutherland found the tax's form itself suspicious because it was measured by the extent of a newspaper's circulation rather than by the volume of its advertising.
Field
action
Value
Tax's form measured by circulation was suspicious
About
incident 1934-us-louisiana-newspaper-tax-grosjean
Source
Grosjean v. American Press Co., Inc., 297 U.S. 233 (1936)
Publisher
Grosjean v. American Press Co., Inc., 297 U.S. 233 (1936)
Method
court record
Checked
2026-09-26
Confidence
high
Status
current
Source date
1936-02-10

Quotation from the source

The form in which the tax is imposed is in itself suspicious. It is not measured or limited by the volume of advertisements.