Claim

Claim 922

The Court held that the statute was not an arbitrary or unreasonable exercise of the state's police power and sustained its constitutionality.

Published 2026-09-26. Last reviewed 2026-09-26. 1 source.

Statement: The Court held that the statute was not an arbitrary or unreasonable exercise of the state's police power and sustained its constitutionality.
Field: status
Value: Statute not an unreasonable exercise of police power
About: incident 1925-us-supreme-court-upholds-gitlow-anarchy-conviction
Source: Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925)
Publisher: Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925)
Method: court record
Checked: 2026-09-26
Confidence: high
Status: current
Source date: 1925-06-08

Quotation from the source

We cannot hold that the present statute is an arbitrary or unreasonable exercise of the police power of the State unwarrantably infringing the freedom of speech or press; and we must and do sustain its constitutionality.