The War On News

A record of government actions against journalism and fact-based reporting, from the first press laws to today

Incident

United States: Justice Department investigates the Chicago Tribune under the Espionage Act over Battle of Midway coverage

United StatesRSF 2026 rank: 64th of 180

Engraving of an empty press briefing room with a lectern and rows of chairs

The United States Department of Justice convened a federal grand jury to consider Espionage Act charges against the Chicago Tribune and correspondent Stanley Johnston after the newspaper published details suggesting the Navy had broken Japanese naval codes ahead of the Battle of Midway. The grand jury declined to return an indictment.123

What happened

On June 7, 1942, the Chicago Tribune published a dispatch by war correspondent Stanley Johnston reporting that the United States Navy had known in advance of Japanese plans for the Battle of Midway, detail that closely tracked a secret dispatch Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, commander of the Pacific Fleet, had sent to his commanders on May 31. The article's account of the Japanese fleet's organization suggested that American codebreakers had penetrated Japanese naval communications, one of the most closely held secrets of the war. The Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Justice, and the Navy examined whether Johnston and the Tribune had violated the Espionage Act of 1917 by publishing the leaked classified information. By August 1942, the Department of Justice had convened a federal grand jury in Chicago, hearing testimony from naval officers and editors of other newspapers that had run the story. The grand jury ultimately declined to issue any indictment, avoiding a public trial in which the government feared exposing to Japan that its codes had been broken.12345

What reason was given

Stated justification

Federal investigators viewed the article as damaging national security by indirectly revealing that the United States had penetrated Japan's naval codes.4

What changed for reporting

The grand jury's decision not to indict was heralded as a great First Amendment victory by the Tribune and other news media.5

Timeline

1942

United States: Justice Department investigates the Chicago Tribune under the Espionage Act over Battle of Midway coverage

Who acted

NameRole in this incidentOffice at the time
Federal Bureau of InvestigationenforcedFederal law enforcement agency
United States Department of JusticeenforcedFederal executive department

Outlets and journalists

NameKindRelation
Chicago Tribuneoutletaffected

Sources

  1. Secrecy and Leaks: When the U.S. Government Prosecuted the Chicago TribuneNational Security Archive, George Washington University, 2017-10-25, reporting. Source record
  2. Reporters Committee leads effort to unseal grand jury testimony from 1942 Espionage Act investigation of Chicago TribuneReporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, 2014-11-18, reporting. Source record

Claims and evidence

Each numbered claim quotes the source it rests on.

  1. The Chicago Tribune published Stanley Johnston's article on the Battle of Midway on June 7, 1942, prompting a Department of Justice investigation.The DOJ investigation was sparked by a June 7, 1942 article in the Tribune by correspondent Stanley Johnston, who had been aboard a Navy ship in the Pacific.Reporters Committee leads effort to unseal grand jury testimony from 1942 Espionage Act investigation of Chicago Tribune, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, 2014-11-18.Claim 872, checked 2026-09-26.
  2. A federal grand jury refused to indict the Chicago Tribune in 1942 over Stanley Johnston's article describing advance U.S. Navy knowledge of Japanese plans for the Battle of Midway.a grand jury refused to indict the Chicago Tribune in 1942 for an article stating the U.S. Navy had advance knowledge of Japanese plans to attack Midway IslandSecrecy and Leaks: When the U.S. Government Prosecuted the Chicago Tribune, National Security Archive, George Washington University, 2017-10-25.Claim 873, checked 2026-09-26.
  3. By August 1942 the Department of Justice had convened a federal grand jury to determine whether Johnston and the Tribune had violated the Espionage Act by publishing leaked classified information.By August the DOJ had convened a grand jury to investigate whether Johnston and the Tribune violated the Espionage Act by publishing leaked classified information.Reporters Committee leads effort to unseal grand jury testimony from 1942 Espionage Act investigation of Chicago Tribune, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, 2014-11-18.Claim 874, checked 2026-09-26.
  4. Federal investigators framed the article as damaging national security by indirectly revealing that the United States had penetrated Japan's naval codes.detail FBI, Justice Department, and Navy efforts to charge the Tribune with damaging national security by indirectly alluding to U.S. penetration of Japan's naval codesSecrecy and Leaks: When the U.S. Government Prosecuted the Chicago Tribune, National Security Archive, George Washington University, 2017-10-25.Claim 875, checked 2026-09-26.
  5. News organizations and historians described the grand jury's refusal to indict as a major First Amendment victory for the press.the grand jury declined to issue any indictments, which was heralded as a great First Amendment victory by the Tribune and other news media.Reporters Committee leads effort to unseal grand jury testimony from 1942 Espionage Act investigation of Chicago Tribune, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, 2014-11-18.Claim 876, checked 2026-09-26.