The War On News

How governments have limited journalists, 1900 to today.

Israel: a court bars any mention of the 'Prisoner X' case

Published 2026-09-23. Last reviewed 2026-09-22. 1 source.

Status: in effect, as of 2026-09-22.

What we don't know: The source reviewed does not state when or how the domestic order was eventually narrowed or lifted.

An Israeli judge ordered Israeli media barred from any mention of a prisoner held under a false identity, or of the order itself, applying a system under which security-related stories must be reviewed and cleared by the military before publication.123

Country
Israel (RSF 2026 rank: 116th of 180)
Where
Israel
Level of government
National
Tactic
Prior restraint
Stage
Silence (see the ladder)
Ladder note
A court order barred any domestic mention of a named prisoner's case or of the order itself, backed by a standing system requiring advance approval of security reporting.
Head of government at the time
Benjamin Netanyahu
Issue of the day
The order concerned the custody of a man later identified as Ben Zygier, an Australian-Israeli detained on suspicion of harming state security, whose case Israeli outlets could not report on for years under the order.
Outcome
Unknown, June 1, 2010. The source reviewed, a 2013 annual survey, documents the order's existence and Israel's wider military review system without stating when the domestic order was resolved.
Era
The 2010s

What happened

In June 2010, Israeli district court judge Hila Gerstl issued a court order banning any mention of a prisoner who came to be known publicly only as "Prisoner X," or of the circumstances of his custody, and separately prohibited any mention that the order itself existed. The order operated alongside Israel's long-standing military review system, under which all news publications dealing with security issues must be approved in advance by a military reviewing authority before publication, a standard Israel's High Court has said requires proof that publication would cause imminent, certain and actual harm to state security. Israeli authorities separately maintained an informal Editors' Committee, through which the prime minister's office asked media heads not to publish information described as very embarrassing to a government agency in exchange for advance notice of such information; Haaretz editor-in-chief Aluf Benn declined to take part, saying the arrangement would turn editors into intelligence assets rather than independent journalists.123

The order remained in force inside Israel for years; the case became publicly known only through international reporting.123

What reason was given

Not stated in the sources reviewed as a specific published order; Israel's general standard for pre-publication military review, as set by the High Court, requires proof that publication would cause "imminent, certain, and actual harm to state security."1

What changed for reporting

Israeli media were barred from reporting on the prisoner's case at all for years, and could not even acknowledge that a court order existed, while Israel's wider military review system required advance approval for any security-related story.2

Timeline

2010

Israel: a court bars any mention of the 'Prisoner X' case

Who acted

NameRole in this incidentOffice at the time
Benjamin NetanyahuotherPrime Minister of Israel
Hila GerstlorderedIsraeli district court judge

Outlets and journalists

NameKindRelation
Haaretzoutletaffected
Aluf Bennjournalist, Haaretzaffected

Sources

Claims cited

  1. Israel's High Court requires proof that publication would cause imminent, certain and actual harm to state security before security-related material can be censored. imminent, certain, and actual harm to state security Attacks on the Press in 2013: Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Committee to Protect Journalists, 2014-02-12. Claim 518, checked 2026-09-22.
  2. Haaretz's editor-in-chief declined to join the informal Editors' Committee, saying it would make editors into intelligence assets. turn editors into intelligence 'assets' Attacks on the Press in 2013: Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Committee to Protect Journalists, 2014-02-12. Claim 519, checked 2026-09-22.
  3. The judge's order banned any mention of the prisoner or the circumstances of his custody, and of the order itself. banning "any mention of Prisoner X or the circumstances of his custody", and even prohibited mention of the order itself Attacks on the Press in 2013: Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Committee to Protect Journalists, 2014-02-12. Claim 584, checked 2026-09-22.